EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-09/000014_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Fri Sep 1 16:30:37 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-10-04 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA012168237; Fri, 1 Sep 1995 16:30:37 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from sol (sol.racsa.co.cr) by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010668189; Fri, 1 Sep 1995 16:29:49 -0700
Received: by sol (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
    id AA07395; Fri, 1 Sep 1995 17:19:07 +0600
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 1995 17:19:06 +0600 (GMT)
From: Thomas Desmond <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: pixels;printing
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.90.950901165453.3240B-100000@sol>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 700
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Can anybody tell me if there are guidelines to determine what an
acceptable rendering
resolution would be for an image that is to be printed via wax transfer
at a given size?
For instance, if an image is to be blown up to poster size, is there some
way to calculate a pixel resolution to set for
rendering that wont come out all "blocky", but that also wont waste time
rendering a higher resolution than necessary?

Also, is it necessary to maintain a 752 X 480 relationship between
horizontal and vertical resolutions so as to not distort the image?

While we're at it, could someone tell me the purpose of changing the
pixel aspect?

Thanks to anyone who answers this post.

Tom Desmond
--
Thomas Desmond <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]